Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 19:12:54 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235031] [em] em0: poor NFS performance, strange behavior Message-ID: <bug-235031-7501-mrRgFMik5U@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-235031-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-235031-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235031 Rodney W. Grimes <rgrimes@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rgrimes@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #22 from Rodney W. Grimes <rgrimes@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Martin Birgmeier from comment #21) I wont take the bug as an assignee, but shall speak to what is in the works with respect to em(4) and other iflib'ed devices in the 12.0 release. Release engineering has become aware of several regressions in drivers that= are first released in 12.0 using the new iflib design. There are several commi= ts to ^head, some of which have been merged to stable/12 that address some of these issues. There are several more issues being worked on as well. There has been at least 2 formal requests for 2 different commits related to em(4) regressions to have errata issued. Release engineering is waiting on the first group of fixes to be MFC'ed aft= er=20 testing and plans to work with the security team (so@) to issue an EN for t= hese fixes. The additional fixes that are not in the first EN well be done in a future = EN. Regards, Rod >RE@ PS I do not know if this set of changes fixes your specific bug, but it do= es have a high probability of that. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-235031-7501-mrRgFMik5U>