Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 01 Nov 1999 20:48:28 +0900
From:      "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Threads goals  version II
Message-ID:  <381D7E0C.BDA0204C@newsguy.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9910311817030.8816-100000@home.elischer.org> <199911010225.TAA14010@mt.sri.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams wrote:
> 
> > 3/ One blocking thread cannot block another thread.
> >         Blocking of one thread does not imply that other threads be
> > blocked.
> 
> How about instead of 'cannot' we use the word 'does not necessarily'
> block another thread, and then append 'unless it does using programatic
> means'.

Suggestion: the blocking of a thread does not have the side effect
of blocking other threads.

--
Daniel C. Sobral			(8-DCS)
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org

	"People call him Neutron Star, 'cuz he's so dense lights bends
around him."






To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?381D7E0C.BDA0204C>