Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:38:01 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: Adam Turoff <aturoff@isinet.com>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd vs. linux and NT chart Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.990302153710.22218Z-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990302132445.040f6d40@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Brett Glass wrote: > Well, as I understand it, FreeBSD 3.x is still not what's > recommended for production applications. (I'm installing 2.2.8 on > all of the productions machines I bring up.) So does this count? RELENG_2_2 is dead. RELENG_3 is whats here and now. > I still think it's an unfortunate development, though. Maybe > it's possible to bring in more code from the Net or the CD > after the boot, to keep the boot to one floppy. We've put this off long enough. jkh can give you million reasons why he is more happy with the 2-floppy solution. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.HPP.3.96.990302153710.22218Z-100000>