From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Dec 21 13:34:48 1994
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id NAA18272 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 21 Dec 1994 13:34:48 -0800
Received: from squid.umd.edu (squid.umd.edu [129.2.40.6]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id VAA18264 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 1994 21:34:46 GMT
Received: by squid.umd.edu (5.65/Ultrix3.0-C)
	id AA07866; Wed, 21 Dec 1994 16:40:47 -0500
From: fcawth@squid.umd.edu (Fred Cawthorne)
Message-Id: <9412212140.AA07866@squid.umd.edu>
Subject: Re: Freefall status.
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 94 16:40:47 EST
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199412191613.IAA01010@time.cdrom.com>; from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Dec 19, 94 8:13 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> freefall is upgrading itself to -current right now as there are some
> embarassing bugs in 2.0 that we wouldn't want on freefall, and it
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> should be ready for a return to service sometime early Tuesday morning.
> 
> 					Jordan
> 
Ok...  I have been following this stuff a little bit, but could someone
please list all of the bugs that are in the 2.0 release??  I don't
really care about the install stuff, since it's installed on a couple of
machines already.  Is there anything that effects things in an
up-and-running system?  I am putting together a file server that will do
NFS, pcnfsd, popper, named, and support a few logged-in users.  Would it
be better to sup -current and install from a tape of that??  

Thanks,
Fred.