From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 16 20:07:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: perl@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255E1A14 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:07:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@jetcafe.org) Received: from nahkohe.jetcafe.org (nahkohe.jetcafe.org [205.147.26.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06B3329D9 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:07:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Envelope-To: perl@freebsd.org Received: from [205.147.26.5] (hokkshideh4.jetcafe.org [205.147.26.5]) by nahkohe.jetcafe.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r8GK7f18054687 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:07:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5237650D.4080409@jetcafe.org> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:07:41 -0700 From: Dave Hayes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121121 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrej Zverev Subject: Re: ports/181914: net/p5-Socket-GetAddrInfo fails to build package References: <201309161830.r8GIU1EU041596@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "perl@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:07:43 -0000 On 09/16/13 11:39, Andrej Zverev wrote: > This version (0.22) somehow is totally broken. I can't really tell. It appeared to pass the tests in the work directory. > Installing own files in > random way (or at least I can't understand logic). So if you change it > this way it will also be broken in another way. (pkg-plist) > I think right way: > 1. Revert to 0.21 > 2. Avoid automatic install and write custom do-install target Can you explain this in more detail? I was able to produce what seems to be the correct package by my hack. If you look at pkg-plist, it has this set of substitutions. Without someone to explain what these substitutions are for and why one would or would not want them, it's hard to really understand what you mean. :) -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org >>>> *The opinions expressed above are entirely my own* <<<< The most important service rendered by the press is that of educating people to approach printed matter with distrust.