Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:40:09 +0200 From: Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? Message-ID: <7082e1ef-e9f6-b7d1-c90e-d84f834f4f57@rlwinm.de> In-Reply-To: <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> <CANJ8om6WmNQWibnSCMR2hf09he-wWBUnBmY5Mnn7%2BNtvUHhcBQ@mail.gmail.com> <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25.06.19 04:47, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > On 2019-06-24 19:33, Ultima wrote: >> Hello Mel, >> >> While it may be possible to have an IPv6 only environment, I don't >> think it is really viable. There are simply too many things that >> don't run >> on or have very limited support for IPv6 that it makes it very hard >> to drop IPv4 altogether and until something comes along forcing the >> move it likely won't happen for at least another decade at the minimum. > > Yes, that is why I wrote "Waving a hand at bug-hunting and > lamentations over the inertia of embedded systems designers". > > This a lab experiment specifically to iron out the very wrinkles you > just stated. In that case the answer is yes. At least Github, Stack Overflow and Twitter work just fine on IPv6 only clients as long as you provide NAT64 and DNS64.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7082e1ef-e9f6-b7d1-c90e-d84f834f4f57>