Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 11:35:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@hotjobs.com> To: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kaleb@ics.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Producing non-GPLed tools for FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9810201134520.18282-100000@porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net> In-Reply-To: <362CAB52.2DAE8B0A@ics.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 20 Oct 1998, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > John Polstra wrote: > > > > In article <362B9D4D.500216A0@ics.com>, > > Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kaleb@ics.com> wrote: > > > > > I didn't steal the Intel supplement to the ABI when I left my last job, > > > > No, we don't differ from it > > on our ELF systems (or on our a.out systems either). > > Right. That was my point: gcc would have had to conform to it, and there > would have been no reason for 386BSD to have changed it, or any of *BSD > to have changed it. > > So, where is the FreeBSD ABI defined?!? > > -- > Kaleb > Do a search for pgcc, its web pages speak a lot about ABIs and have several informative links. Alfred Perlstein - Programmer, HotJobs Inc. - www.hotjobs.com -- There are operating systems, and then there's FreeBSD. -- http://www.freebsd.org/ 3.0-current To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9810201134520.18282-100000>