From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Apr 19 11:49:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dualcpus.com (dualcpus.com [65.160.20.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92D3837B43C for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 11:49:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jgowdy@home.com) Received: (qmail 36330 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2001 18:49:44 -0000 Received: from sherline.cts.com (HELO server2) (204.216.163.132) by dualcpus.com with SMTP; 19 Apr 2001 18:49:44 -0000 Message-ID: <003201c0c901$7fa93600$015778d8@sherline.net> From: "Jeremiah Gowdy" To: "Charles Burns" , Cc: , , , , References: Subject: Re: the AMD factor in FreeBSD Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 11:49:41 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > There are other things to consider like CAS latency, CAS-to-RAS latency and > other latencies which I can't remember at the moment and the chipset and > stuff. DDR is, as you said, certainly much faster overall. I have recently learned the blessings of lower CAS latency. I have two 128meg Mushkin rev3s. They are 2-2-2 @150mhz. Even though my Athlon K75 (.18 micron with cache still off-die) 1ghz will only run the memory at 133mhz, it's still nice to know I can have CAS2 at 150mhz :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message