From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 3 12:54:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954DA106566B for ; Sat, 3 May 2008 12:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from mail5out.barnet.com.au (mail5.barnet.com.au [202.83.178.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C618FC1C for ; Sat, 3 May 2008 12:54:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: by mail5out.barnet.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EAC702218A66; Sat, 3 May 2008 22:54:24 +1000 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <481C60800000B8432A0E8A@BarNet> Received: from mail5auth.barnet.com.au (mail5.barnet.com.au [202.83.178.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail5auth.barnet.com.au", Issuer "*.barnet.com.au" (verified OK)) by mail5.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C0221B2401; Sat, 3 May 2008 22:54:24 +1000 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (k7.mavetju.org [10.251.1.18]) by mail5auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2512218994; Sat, 3 May 2008 22:54:23 +1000 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 661D0314; Sat, 3 May 2008 22:54:23 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 22:54:23 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Martin Sch?tte Message-ID: <20080503125423.GA74315@k7.mavetju> References: <481B7ED4.3020208@mschuette.name> <1723583765.20080503123027@mail.ru> <481C5CF9.1090705@mschuette.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <481C5CF9.1090705@mschuette.name> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Improving Syslog X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 12:54:26 -0000 On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 02:39:21PM +0200, Martin Sch?tte wrote: > I only wonder if that would not be the bigger and more drastic change > that would prevent adoption; just like FreeBSD keeps Sendmail instead of > adopting Postfix in its base system. There are other reasons for this. And the way the mail system is setup makes it is very simple to replace the default MTA with an other MTA in the ports collection. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/