From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 14 20:25:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA18899 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 14 Feb 1998 20:25:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alexanderwohl.complete.org (ict61.southwind.net [206.53.100.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA18788 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 1998 20:24:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jgoerzen@alexanderwohl.complete.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alexanderwohl.complete.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA00273; Sat, 14 Feb 1998 22:21:46 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jgoerzen@alexanderwohl.complete.org) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 22:21:46 -0600 (CST) From: John Goerzen X-Sender: jgoerzen@alexanderwohl To: John Kenagy cc: Vincent Defert , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 11 Feb 1998, John Kenagy wrote: > Three words, and a short (very) short explanation. > > ---> One single distribution. <--- > > No kernel from one source, libraries from another, etc. > I do not need suprises. To be fair, this is the proverbial double-edged sword. The purpose of the Linux distribution is to integrate things nicely. And to be fair, Debian in particular has things very well integrated and has a package system quite superior to FreeBSD. OTOH, FreeBSD has a good edge on Slackware in most everything :-) Furthermore, FreeBSD uses components from various sources -- Perl from Larry Wall, gcc from the FSF, libc from BSD, etc. One mistake people often make is comparing "Linux" to something else. This is rarely what people mean to do; a more accurate comparison would be Debian vs. FreeBSD or RedHat vs. FreeBSD. The ONLY time when a "Linux vs FreeBSD" comparison is valid is when discussing the kernel itself, and even then it is not always valid. Please, let's focus on the facts, shall we? As somebody that has extensive experience with Debian GNU/Linux and a good deal of experience with FreeBSD, here are my general thoughts: FreeBSD's advantages: * Good laptop support. Works on a wider variety of laptops than Linux. * A tighter defafult configuration, security-wise. * Console screen savers better than standard "black screen" * Nice /etc/rc.conf system. Debian cannot practically use such a thing because of the large number of packages that can configure themselves for use. * Good for anyone using a BSD-ish system like BSDi * Kernel releases are always stable * Kernel source under CVS * make world capability * More stable (meaning changes less frequently, and somewhat better reliability) networking code * Live filesystem CD available * Managed by small development team. * A steady commercial backer. * Helpful user community. Debian advantages: * Many packages come with configuration tools * Many more bundled packages. The ENTIRE system is in package form, not just the add-ons. The package manager is Debian's largest benefit and something that really is unmatched by anything else. The package system yields the following benefits: + Easy upgrades, usually under 15 mins and not requiring any reboot + Easy configuration of a set of machines identically + Documentation is in a well-defined standard location + A source package format superior to FreEBSD's, though notably lacking make world. * Faster networking code * Support for more hardware. However, some of the very new drivers are sometimes in beta stage. * More documentation. * Better cooperation with non-BSD OSs. * Tighter integration. Many of the packages I have found contain bugs. For instance, dependencies on non-existant packages, files placed in incorrect locations, looking in the wrong place for files, etc. * Public bug-tracking system for all packages. * Standardized and logical filesystem layout * Helpful and polite user community. You wouldn't believe how many FreeBSD users criticize me for using both FreeBSD and Linux. I have been flamed by FreeBSD'ers because I use Linux as well... I have never been flamed by a Linux user for using FreeBSD as well. * Console mouse support that doesn't conflict with X. So... to sum it all up. Neither is better. It depends on your needs. If you have dozens of machines to admin, and are short on admin resources, then Debian is your obvious choice. If you want something that is rock-solid and developed like a commercial OS, FreeBSD is the choice. If you want a progressive system, often the first with new features, Debian is better. If you want top-notch multitasking performance under stress, FreeBSD is better. It all depends. Either system will perform quite well in just about any circumstance. Often, the difference between the two is minor. IMHO, the only exception to this is Debian's package management system, which is far superior to FreeBSD's. However, there's nothing keeping FreeBSD from using that system too... John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message