From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jun 24 19:31:32 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA12712 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 19:31:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tombstone.sunrem.com (tombstone.sunrem.com [206.81.134.54]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA12696 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 19:31:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from brandon@localhost) by tombstone.sunrem.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id UAA00183; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 20:16:56 -0600 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 20:16:56 -0600 (MDT) From: Brandon Gillespie To: JOHN cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XInside's AccelX - 20% real memory? In-Reply-To: <01I6APLP4NIQ8WWODO@POMONA.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 24 Jun 1996, JOHN wrote: > Running AccelX on FreeBSD, with 1152x9?? resolution and 65,000+ colors, > should the XServer show a 20% memory usage with ps aux? This is on > a PC with 48MB of memory, so this is 9MB+ of RAM. Does this sound reasonable? How long has it been running? I find my XFree86 server around 9-10 MB often, after 10-20 days of consecutive execution (i.e. not shutdowns/restarts). I'm assuming Xaccell will slowly bloat as well, as I havn't see an X server which doesn't. Have you been running any graphics intensive programs? Netscape? GIMP? Ted Turner Netrek? -Brandon Gillespie