Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:21:16 -0800 From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> To: Danny Howard <dannyman@toldme.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of 6.0 for production systems Message-ID: <43738F9C.8050205@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20051110181447.GC23887@ratchet.nebcorp.com> References: <20051110012313.GB22149@mind.net> <54db43990511091749h7b7c0753vbf7adbce94eff6cc@mail.gmail.com> <20051110081424.GA46702@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051110180048.GB23887@ratchet.nebcorp.com> <43738D14.9030006@freebsd.org> <20051110181447.GC23887@ratchet.nebcorp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Danny Howard wrote: > So, the 6.0 denotes some note-worthy realignment of the symbol table or > such. Thank you for an excellent answer, Colin. Some of us were > secretly worried that FreeBSD was catching a case of the Sun Marketing. > :) If we were suffering from versionitis, we would have released FreeBSD 10.6.0, with FreeBSD 10.6.1, 10.6.2, and 10.6.3 to follow over the next year. :-) Colin Percival
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43738F9C.8050205>