From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 11 06:51:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E47516A41F for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 06:51:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8119143D53 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 06:51:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9B6pbai048604; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:51:37 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <434B6102.2050608@samsco.org> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:51:46 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050615 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Keller References: <434B601F.40007@contexthosting.net> In-Reply-To: <434B601F.40007@contexthosting.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading from FreeBSD 5.4 to 6 - Make world or binary install? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 06:51:50 -0000 Jim Keller wrote: > Hello, > I'm trying to determine which version of FreeBSD to install on a new > server I have coming in, since I know that the 5 branch is to become an > errata branch sooner rather than later. The migration guide from 4.x to > 5.x recommends a clean install of FreeBSD followed by data restoration, > which makes sense considering the major changes in 5.x, especially to > the filesystem. However, will this still hold true for going from 5.x to > 6? I'd prefer to install 5.4 for now then run a buildworld later and > bump it to 6, but will buildworld be a reasonable way of going from 5.4 > to 6? > > Thanks > > -Jim Keller Upgrading from 5.4 to 6.0 is very easy. I did it last weekend on my firewall+mailserver with just the normal upgrade procedures. The only gotcha that I can think of is the renamed serial ports. Scott