From owner-cvs-all Wed Sep 18 14:16:55 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E959E37B401 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail16.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9E843E65 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:16:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 4639 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2002 21:18:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) by mail16.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 18 Sep 2002 21:18:27 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8ILGnBv063048; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:16:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.2 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20020918233823.D15711-100000@gamplex.bde.org> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:16:51 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Bruce Evans Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/chmod chmod.1 chmod.c Cc: ru@FreeBSD.org, bde@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Tom Rhodes , Johan Karlsson Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 18-Sep-2002 Bruce Evans wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Johan Karlsson wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 16:38 (-0700) +0000, Tom Rhodes wrote: >> > trhodes 2002/09/17 16:38:33 PDT >> > >> > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) >> > bin/chmod chmod.1 chmod.c >> > Log: >> > MFC: 'h' missing in getopt() call >> >> I'm still missing the functional change in rev 1.21 of chmod.c >> >> This cut-n-pasted part of that change has not yet been MFCed. > >> [Patch deleted] > >> Bruce, Ruslan, is this something that should be MFCed as well >> or do we only want to document the faked support for -h? > > Sigh; I thought the committed patch was to unbreak the unfaking of > the support. The correct fix would have been to back MFC of -current > bits that don't apply to RELENG_4 in rev.1.17.2.10. Agreed. We (re@) were given the impression the support was there just not in the usage, etc. Probably the code that was just MFC'd should just be backed out for now. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message