From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 14 10:19:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99F116A422; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:19:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hq@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A619343D45; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:19:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hq@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (hq@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1EAJFO4070154; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:19:15 GMT (envelope-from hq@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from hq@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1EAJFYW070150; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:19:15 GMT (envelope-from hq) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:19:15 GMT From: Herve Quiroz Message-Id: <200602141019.k1EAJFYW070150@freefall.freebsd.org> To: mwfp@alfa12.isp-service.biz, hq@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, hq@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/93322: New port: java/jakarta-commons-io a library of io utilities X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:19:16 -0000 Synopsis: New port: java/jakarta-commons-io a library of io utilities State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: hq State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 14 10:13:48 UTC 2006 State-Changed-Why: There are a couple of improvements to be applied: - The header says commons-dbutils - If the ports sets USE_ANT, then there is no need to register a dependency on Ant in BUILD_DEPENDS - "-cp " should be passed to Ant through MAKE_ARGS - According to the porter's handbook, 'java' category should not be the main category of a new port, save for ports that are directly related to the Java platform (which is not the case here). I suggest the port goes to the 'devel' category instead. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->hq Responsible-Changed-By: hq Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 14 10:13:48 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll handle this. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=93322