From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 29 21:55:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D20C37B68F; Mon, 29 May 2000 21:55:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (doug@master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA14244; Mon, 29 May 2000 21:55:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@gorean.org) Message-ID: <393349CC.66070C95@gorean.org> Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 21:55:40 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT-0528 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Heckaman Cc: Kris Kennaway , Kenneth W Cochran , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 4.0-stable, OpenSSH v1 & v2 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matt Heckaman wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 29 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > [...] > : > Is it reasonable to assume that OpenSSH v2 will (should) > : > disappear from ports when/if it goes to the main source tree? > : > : Once we stop supporting FreeBSD 3.x in ports.. > > To be honest, do we WANT to stop supporting it in the ports? Think about that for a minute. Do we still want to support FreeBSD 2.1.x in the ports? Assuming the answer is no, all Kris is saying is that when we stop supporting 3.x, the openss[hl] ports will disappear. Please don't overreact. :) Doug -- "Live free or die" - State motto of my ancestral homeland, New Hampshire Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message