From owner-freebsd-net  Mon May 15  9:26:57 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.surf1.de (mail.surf1.de [194.25.165.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1204237B578
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 15 May 2000 09:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from alex@cichlids.com)
Received: from cichlids.com (p3E9C1148.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [62.156.17.72])
	by mail.surf1.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA11759;
	Mon, 15 May 2000 06:24:10 +0200
Received: from cichlids.cichlids.com (cichlids.cichlids.com [192.168.0.10])
	by cichlids.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A1E11AC2C; Mon, 15 May 2000 18:26:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from alex@localhost)
	by cichlids.cichlids.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA01005;
	Mon, 15 May 2000 18:26:35 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from alex)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 18:26:35 +0200
From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>
To: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: socket programming
Message-ID: <20000515182635.A408@cichlids.cichlids.com>
References: <3920178a0.244e@databus.databus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp"
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <3920178a0.244e@databus.databus.com>; from barney@databus.com on Mon, May 15, 2000 at 11:27:00AM -0400
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 28 CA 4C 46 5B D3 A8  A8 E3 BA F3 4E 60 7D 7F
X-Verwirrung: Dieser Header dient der allgemeinen Verwirrung.
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Thus spake Barney Wolff (barney@databus.com):

> Sigh.  Quoting RFC 857:

Either you are right and all telnet-clients I can use atm (Linux,
Windows9x, FreeBSD) have implemented things wrong or maybe you are
wrong.
If you are right, I suggest you rewrite things and shout at the guys
that they have implemented the protocol wrongly and send them patches.
In this case, I was also right, since I said the things have the same
effect (on clients _I_ know, also, if this violates the RfC).

I suggest trying out the attached source, with and without commented
out the handshake and see, what happens.

In your opinion this should have no effect since DONT ECHO doesn't
mean that.

Thanks

Alex
-- 
I need a new ~/.sig.

--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="localecho.c"

#include        <sys/types.h>
#include        <sys/socket.h>
#include        <stdio.h>
#include		<netinet/in.h>

int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
	int             listenfd, sockfd;
	struct sockaddr_in servaddr, cliaddr;
	int             on, clilen;
	char            buf[10];

	if ((listenfd = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0)) == -1)
		exit(1);
	on = 1;
	if (setsockopt(listenfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &on, sizeof(int)) == -1)
		exit(1);
	bzero(&servaddr, sizeof(servaddr));
	servaddr.sin_family = AF_INET;
	servaddr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY);
	servaddr.sin_port = htons(12345);
	if (bind(listenfd, (struct sockaddr *) & servaddr, sizeof(servaddr)) == -1)
		exit(1);
	if (listen(listenfd, 2) == -1)
		exit(1);
	clilen = sizeof(cliaddr);
	sockfd = accept(listenfd, (struct sockaddr *) & cliaddr, &clilen);
	write(sockfd, "\377\373\1\0", 4);
	for (;;) {
		printf("Received %i bytes...\n", read(sockfd, buf, 9));
	}			/* forever */
	return (0);
}

--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message