From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Jun 25 21:30:54 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA22849
          for ports-outgoing; Sun, 25 Jun 1995 21:30:54 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA22843
          ; Sun, 25 Jun 1995 21:30:52 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id VAA03706; Sun, 25 Jun 1995 21:30:49 -0700
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 1995 21:30:49 -0700
Message-Id: <199506260430.VAA03706@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jkh@freebsd.org
CC: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, ports@freefall.cdrom.com
In-reply-to: <283.804140527@whisker.internet-eireann.ie> (jkh@freebsd.org)
Subject: Re: procmail goes south.
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * It's on freefall - I keep forgetting that freefall's rather out
 * of date.. :-(
 * 
 * Sorry for the false alarm!

No problem.  But people keep reporting errors though.  Maybe we can
make ports totally unbuildable on freefall.  Hmm, how does "rm -rf
/usr/ports/distfiles; ln -s /dev/null /usr/ports/distfiles" sound? :)

Satoshi (I'm half serious)