From owner-freebsd-security  Fri Jul  9  0:57:47 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from buddy.sovlink.ru (buddy.sovlink.ru [194.186.12.9])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AEB14DA6
	for <security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  9 Jul 1999 00:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from alla@sovlink.ru)
Received: from sovlink.ru (punk.sovlink.ru [194.186.12.133])
	by buddy.sovlink.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA04288;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 12:08:37 +0400 (MSD)
Message-ID: <3785AB58.2B3D8F05@sovlink.ru>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 11:57:12 +0400
From: Alla Bezroutchko <alla@sovlink.ru>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: ru,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Syslog alternatives?
References: <199907090707.RAA16350@cheops.anu.edu.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Darren Reed wrote:
> In some mail from Alla Bezroutchko, sie said:
> > Could someone explain me or point me to some resources that explain
> > why syslogd is bad?
> 
> Prove to me that your log files have any integrity, in such a way that
> I cannot dispute it.

How integrity is achieved with syslog's alternatives?

Alla.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message