From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 13 05:59:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC58816A4DA; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 05:59:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A5543D45; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 05:59:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7D5xl1p009531; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:59:47 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id k7D5xlV0009530; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:59:47 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:59:47 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: Colin Percival Message-ID: <20060813055947.GA9508@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Colin Percival , src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200608130532.k7D5WA6g040164@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608130532.k7D5WA6g040164@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/named Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 05:59:50 -0000 On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 05:32:10AM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: > cperciva 2006-08-13 05:32:10 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > usr.sbin/named Makefile > Log: > Undefine __DATE__ in order to avoid placing a build timestamp into > /usr/sbin/{named, lwresd}. Note that POSIX / C99 doesn't technically > allow __DATE__ to be (un|re)defined, but gcc does what we mean anyway. There is a warning. Probably it can interfere with future warn level increasing. What about _re_defining date, say, to the date of named import? -- http://ache.pp.ru/