Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 11:34:24 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> Cc: current@FreeBSd.org Subject: Re: named & chroot & rcNG & devfs Message-ID: <20030216113424.4312120f.Alexander@Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20030214173157.GF83215@roark.gnf.org> References: <20030211185931.0d37ef82.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <20030214173157.GF83215@roark.gnf.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 09:31:57 -0800
Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 06:59:31PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > /etc/rc.d/named copies /dev with pax to the named chroot directory. This
> > is obviously wrong with devfs, isn't it?
>
> You should read the script a little closer. That code path is only taken
> on NetBSD.
---snip---
case ${OSTYPE} in
FreeBSD)
! checkyesno named_rcng && return 0
# Is the user using a sandbox?
if [ -z "$named_chrootdir" ]; then
rc_flags="-u $nuser -g $ngroup $rc_flags"
return 0
fi
# Do the following checks only if the user wants them done
checkyesno named_chroot_autoupdate && chroot_autoupdate
;;
---snip---
I read this as:
If there's a non null named_chrootdir, then check if we want the
autoupdate, else just run with user/group.
BTW.: What does a '!' as the first character of a command in a /bin/sh
script mean (I know what it means in zsh/tcsh/bash when used
interactively, but the above use of it is unknown to me)?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Yes, I've heard of "decaf." What's your point?
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030216113424.4312120f.Alexander>
