From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May  9 23:26:38 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C302106564A
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun,  9 May 2010 23:26:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net)
Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com
	[66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B898FC0C
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun,  9 May 2010 23:26:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41])
	by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4951DF545B
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun,  9 May 2010 19:26:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161])
	by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 09 May 2010 19:26:37 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com;
	h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	s=smtpout; bh=f30PSYJenaAVbfJgqOlc4yDYhcM=;
	b=qClSSD1zVZj5d3U9vP6BI7ep1wOOtxaHvSFRntFE8Ycw+WnJDtnXLViWEYA6Nio163WdTcmumsS56QXkplR1pOwRQFJDA01tgd15v1eLoQRs8PxasEDoBt+LoQIIiGX9XGAUJ2I1c202l9+KiRgVyTsMgKimBe30fzJYzyM0+9E=
X-Sasl-enc: fqjNlblVFvLgt39veB8COgnnb0YeHIxHn9UwxOxrDVW1 1273447594
Received: from anglepoise.lon.incunabulum.net
	(cpc2-dals7-0-0-cust253.hari.cable.virginmedia.com [82.35.112.254])
	by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 019924C111
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun,  9 May 2010 19:26:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4BE744A8.80301@incunabulum.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 00:26:32 +0100
From: Bruce Simpson <bms@incunabulum.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100425 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
References: <473112.87657.qm@web63906.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <473112.87657.qm@web63906.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Intel 10Gb
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 23:26:38 -0000

On 05/09/10 14:43, Barney Cordoba wrote:
>
> Blah, Blah, Blah. Let's see some real numbers on real networks under
> real loads. Until then, you've got nothing.
>    

But that's also blah blah on your part, Barney.

As long as the peak throughput under load in testing is above the median 
range for the kind of traffic you intend (which your grossly general 
statement omits to describe), it's fine.

Otherwise, why not offer to help test Murat's patches-- instead of 
dissing him on a public mailing list?

To share, or to shaft...