From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 3 23:55:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894D5106564A for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 23:55:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6888FC08 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 23:55:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so1621306wah.27 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:55:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lOm6rFbP1w+7JorDiUCFtt5u+tjqW7DzWD4CNZFtWFc=; b=oev32FySq0z8NyIba2nu3nVlNBXZcFyfOqRyZLzGRPutS6vsTWDQCOH4XKIfE5EjDT PHdoWJAP4wTEazz3DZ770kxcDgFN80CKtToZXqJAuV5ZyYDV5pfNhl1icvN9Wb9lwi8G ET5vlwcNZGL/ta0puM8bGMT7NbGl58EPHYct4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=BT9iNp3xRFs6AONBMPphfJ6mVJd6GsRezbNMGdqRc9qXbk93JdpTqzH8WRNiN4hmnA IIaNEXW07rXDeXFPkvSYt98P3/3eA9GE1SwD89CFNM22plxiMT1x8+PRaGl0+JXhHlyq oX5MlT449Z5tzOZzIDG+3af3fwlwKerKRU8cU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.32.18 with SMTP id k18mr3686356waj.98.1236123106329; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:31:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <207313.79096.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <20090303203015.GA31097@insightsol.com> <207313.79096.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:31:46 -0800 Message-ID: <2a41acea0903031531q18527c7ar56d6fb9548e4916d@mail.gmail.com> From: Jack Vogel To: barney_cordoba@yahoo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: current@freebsd.org, Navdeep Parhar Subject: Re: Multiqueue status X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:55:40 -0000 I will make the Intel drivers utilize this in 8, its just one task among many in my queue. Jack On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Barney Cordoba wrote: > > > > > --- On Tue, 3/3/09, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > > > From: Navdeep Parhar > > Subject: Re: Multiqueue status > > To: "Barney Cordoba" > > Cc: current@freebsd.org > > Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 3:30 PM > > On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 04:37:45AM -0800, Barney Cordoba > > wrote: > > > > > > I see some mention of INET_MULTIQUEUE and use of a new > > flowid in the mbuf > > > packet header, but don't see anywhere that the > > flowid is set. Is this a > > > future feature, or is this currently implemented? > > > > There is at least one driver, cxgb(4), that makes use of > > flowid. You > > can browse through the files in sys/dev/cxgb/ to see how > > it's used. > > > > Regards, > > Navdeep > > Yes I noticed that. I'm working on igb/ixgbe for a commercial > application for 7.x, and I'd like to implement it in a way that is > somewhat compatible with 8. I'm just playing with it at this point > to see the performance trade offs. > > Barney > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >