From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 18 15:45:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04DD16A4CE; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:45:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [83.167.185.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583F243D41; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:45:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746EA651FA; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:45:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02710-03-12; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:45:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (dhcp52.icir.org [192.150.187.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBF2651EE; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:45:14 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 580AA62DB; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:45:42 -0700 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Harti Brandt Message-ID: <20050418154542.GC756@empiric.icir.org> References: <20050415173711.I658@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <20050416150810.GD5452@empiric.icir.org> <20050418093938.I1882@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050418093938.I1882@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:45:45 -0000 On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:40:55AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: > BMS>Oh. Don't remove that. Userland PPP needs it. People who are using ADSL > BMS>modems of any kind will still need it. > Does it really use socket(AF_ATM, ... or socket(AF_NATM, ...? Any chance > to convert this to netgraph sockets? It uses an AF_NATM socket. I believe we probably could do a conversion to use ng_atm quite easily, and for the ATM case that would certainly be desirable, however there are then the issues of making /usr/sbin/ppp dependent on libnetgraph.so, will the original author/maintainer be happy with such a change, and so on. BMS