From owner-freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 28 21:04:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-i386@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-i386@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8710016A492 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:04:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D43543DCE for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:00:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kASL0Xv2006371 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:00:33 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id kASL0XlM006369; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:00:33 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:00:33 GMT Message-Id: <200611282100.kASL0XlM006369@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org From: puc-uart@oldach.net (Helge Oldach) Cc: Subject: Re: i386/105616: UART PCI device just silent... X-BeenThere: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Helge Oldach List-Id: I386-specific issues for FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:04:06 -0000 The following reply was made to PR i386/105616; it has been noted by GNATS. From: puc-uart@oldach.net (Helge Oldach) To: xcllnt@mac.com (Marcel Moolenaar) Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: i386/105616: UART PCI device just silent... Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:49:45 +0100 (CET) Hi Marcel, one more observation: When I connect the two puc uart ports at different speeds, communication still works fine. It even works with 50 against 115200 bps, in either direction! Even piping files to remote works without visible errors. Further, if I place both sides at 50 bps (via "cu -s 50"), communication is definitely much faster than one would expect at 50 bps. And it doesn't seem to change when both ends are at 115200. I'd say the actual speed is somewhere around 9600. It seems that setting clock rate on this board does not work properly, but instead some default non-standard value remains set forever... Regards, Helge