From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  8 05:32:52 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C9E1B16A4CE; Fri,  8 Apr 2005 05:32:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F255743D4C; Fri,  8 Apr 2005 05:32:51 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j385WpkU023818;
	Fri, 8 Apr 2005 07:32:51 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:45:20 EDT."
             <20050407234520.GA30206@VARK.MIT.EDU> 
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 07:32:51 +0200
Message-ID: <23817.1112938371@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 geom.4 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 05:32:53 -0000

In message <20050407234520.GA30206@VARK.MIT.EDU>, David Schultz writes:

>> I'm sure that if it is important some developers will jump in and
>> make it better.
>
>This sort of attitude is related to a complaint of a number of
>ports developers and others, namely, that some people refuse to
>fix the things that they break.

This is supposed to be a group effort, and that is supposed to mean
that we help each other out.  If you demand that kernel developers
fix every single possible implication of their work, our kernel
will not change much in the future.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.