From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr  4 10:58:46 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644CE1065670;
	Mon,  4 Apr 2011 10:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru)
Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151B88FC0A;
	Mon,  4 Apr 2011 10:58:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from gate.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.123] helo=h30.sp.ipt.ru)
	by services.ipt.ru with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD))
	id 1Q6hUZ-000GEo-Vp; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:58:44 +0400
From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
To: "Ganael LAPLANCHE" <martymac@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201104040826.p348QXDY066404@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20110404085321.GA3051@FreeBSD.org>
	<20110404092027.M23377@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:58:43 +0400
In-Reply-To: <20110404092027.M23377@FreeBSD.org> (Ganael LAPLANCHE's message
	of "Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:23:32 +0200 (CEST)")
Message-ID: <01343804@h30.sp.ipt.ru>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/deskutils/xneur Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
	ports/deskutils/xneur/files patch-configure patch-etc-Makefile.in
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 10:58:46 -0000

On Mon,  4 Apr 2011 11:23:32 +0200 (CEST) Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 08:53:21 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote

> > Pardon, but how can PR submitted by maintainer be approved by timeout
> > thereof?

> This is a special situation : I had suggested several improvements over
> the original PR, but have never received any answer from the maintainer.

> So his first patch was (of course) approved, but mine has never been.
> This is why I have also specified a timeout for this commit.

> Am I wrong ?

The common practice is to use [X], ex.:

-----
  - Update to 0.12.0  [1]
  - Convert PCRE option to a mandatory LIB_DEPENDS  [1]
  - Fix or improve several OPTIONS handling and dependencies  [1]
  - Remove useless CFLAGS patch  [2]
  - Handle sample configuration file as advised in the handbook  [2]
  
  PR:     155537  [1]
  Submitted by:   Alex Keda <admin@lissyara.su> (maintainer)  [1]
  Approved by:    maintainer timeout (18 days)  [2]
-----

-- 
WBR, bsam