Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:18:00 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Andreas Davour <ante@Update.UU.SE> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is bpf a part of IPFW, or am I confused? Message-ID: <20050105201800.GA29099@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501052107010.6553@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501052107010.6553@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:09:55PM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote: >=20 > I started to do some research for a kernel compile that should migrate=20 > my system into the future I came upon the line "options bpf" in the=20 > kernel config file. >=20 > I have searched the handbook and the manpages and not really understood= =20 > the role of bpf. Is it supposed to be enabled when I use IPFW or is it=20 > another beast altogether, best left undisturbed? It's completely separate. Kris --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3Et4Wry0BWjoQKURAggVAJsHi36xsmQOPQZiJxLLXdYscucaNgCfUgvy +WFedwF7XmPfdjVNECNpIes= =bRIf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --huq684BweRXVnRxX--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050105201800.GA29099>