From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 20 22:57:31 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 83B8316A4B3; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8E3B443F85; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h8L5vMGA020314;
	Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:57:22 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:57:23 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20030920.235723.32536816.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: jb@cimlogic.com.au
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030921051525.GA31537@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au>
References: <20030920.204425.25098720.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.10.10309210106070.26520-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
	<20030921051525.GA31537@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: deischen@freebsd.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: h@schmalzbauer.de
Subject: Re: ports and -current
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 05:57:31 -0000

In message: <20030921051525.GA31537@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au>
            John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> writes:
: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:07:15AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
: > But you seem to thing -pthread == NOOP unbreaks ports ;-)
: 
: Warner might

It appreas to unbreak one port: icecast.  It was the first port I
found so I assumed many ports were that way, but I couldn't find any
others having gone and looked at the breakage right now.

: but Kris doesn't. Kris is asking for the -pthread option
: to be restored to let -current users breath easy while the task of updating
: the ports goes on. Then he's happy for it to become a noop.

I'd be cool with this.  I don't think the 'unfreeze the ports' option
is a viable one, which leaves us with this.

Warner