From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 3 22:26:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E5F1065731; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:26:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C2F8FC08; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so325435iah.13 for ; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:26:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UM7++9qK4OQ7PwgDZCb9TmAF008jnku458Om2Mc1lj8=; b=QH6BSubDqFMCp1l8Tyr34xgfHZMAXmKJ3c0N1SSen9ntzt2E4pWGqHCt89uVM+Qk9g P8Xya4hyfym/iaeiLhJFlILgfQ3eoJkLSETET2YavFBJcUcsrq4XHzB0W64kpn0N641Z rZmnrVPN1cKcrg8WweHOj3VW7RzqTFQdEn0ayfrjjjw+vYqbInoN6Ag6ORmV6X7opNbm 3GCWLUj8tHFdFzhQHQJDb+wpq3XlAHlJOpmyyGYoqtEUDOmy5xUb2zHr3eMRjVYe0CSv oKdHnF/vYrrOWPQ1GqN+4HwZaO14DwJQhWXQw66ka4T8+hiLFnrgBwahuBc/hF6WCdqG lhZg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.106.132 with SMTP id gu4mr3429687igb.59.1333491998786; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:26:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.109.197 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:26:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120403215714.GO93449@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20120403082927.GH93449@alchemy.franken.de> <20120403122858.GA48373@alchemy.franken.de> <20120403215714.GO93449@alchemy.franken.de> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 02:26:38 +0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: avOp4TUErq_0_X5htyItRJpP9Uo Message-ID: From: Andrew Pantyukhin To: Marius Strobl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" , "zvqops@di.vc" , "ken@freebsd.org" , "Desai, Kashyap" , "McConnell, Stephen" Subject: Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:26:39 -0000 On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Marius Strobl w= rote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:52:14PM -0600, McConnell, Stephen wrote: >> Marius, >> >> Since the 0x59 device is a MegaRAID device, shouldn't you be using the M= egaRAID driver. =C2=A0Why is the MPT driver being used in this case? =C2=A0= The problem is that the MPT driver was wrongly attaching to some MegaRAID c= ontrollers and that was causing conflict problems, so that was fixed by rem= oving MegaRAID ID's from the MPT driver. > > Apparently, the 0x59 devices worked just fine using mpt(4) before r232411= . > Are MegaRAID devices backwards-compatible so they can alternatively be > driven by MPT drivers? The device in question is a built-in 1068-based controller on a SuperMicro X8ST3 board. It can be converted to MegaRAID mode with a special addon "button" (AOC-IButton68). http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon3000/X58/X8ST3-F.cfm