From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 01:42:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE6E16A4CE; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 01:42:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E264443D2D; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 01:42:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 6A0465309; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:42:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 6B4405308; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:41:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id ECBEF33C6F; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:41:57 +0100 (CET) To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey References: <3109.192.168.1.147.1076687025.squirrel@internet.centrenad.com> <3109.192.168.1.147.1076687025.squirrel@internet.centrenad.com> <20040213232611.GP61632@wantadilla.lemis.com> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:41:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20040213232611.GP61632@wantadilla.lemis.com> (Greg Lehey's message of "Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:56:11 +1030") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,PLING_QUERY autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Vincent Rioux Subject: Re: Vinum dumpconfig returns nothing ?!? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:42:07 -0000 Greg 'groggy' Lehey writes: > On Friday, 13 February 2004 at 17:04:45 +0100, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: > > Vinum does not play along with GEOM and should therefore be considered > > broken in 5.x. > No, that is not correct. The only thing that doesn't work is swap on > a Vinum volume. Last I tried (on 5.1), performance was abysmal and the machine panicked. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no