From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Apr 28 14:43:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F492BB5AC for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:43:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49BPXt4q7Pz3KFY; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:43:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.93.0.4 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jTRSf-000Ioq-3h; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:43:49 +0200 Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:43:49 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Dan Langille Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports , "mandree@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: mail/mailman v3? Message-ID: <20200428144349.GV90255@fc.opsec.eu> References: <20200424130424.GJ39563@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49BPXt4q7Pz3KFY X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.68 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.78)[-0.780,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.10)[0.104,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:43:59 -0000 Hi! > I see the mailman lists themselves are now on Mailman 3: > > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-announce@python.org/thread/HHQN7V6NY7G5CTOSC3WBU7VXW5KEBGVO/ Interesting! Looks like a very uncomfortable design for uniq URLs 8-( -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 Now what ?