Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:25:24 +0100 From: Thomas-Martin Seck <tmseck-lists@netcologne.de> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OPTIONS, LATEST_LINK, and RCng Message-ID: <20040223132524.GA520@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> In-Reply-To: <4039F58C.1020004@fillmore-labs.com> References: <20040223120917.608.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <4039F58C.1020004@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Oliver Eikemeier (eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com): > Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: > > >[...] > > > >No, the script is rcNG _aware_. If rc.subr is not present in the two > >locations where the scripts expects it to be, the script will just > >behave like any other rc script. An added bonus is that you get reload, > >restart, and status functions from rcNG. > > I believe that is confusing, since the script will start without requiring > enable_dansguardian="YES" in /etc/rc.conf if and only if rc.subr is on your > system, which means that it changes its behaviour when I install/deinstall > other ports. What are you talking about? I was talking about the squid start scripts. > >>You should just USE_RC_SUBR=yes with > > > >I deliberately avoided this dependency for the squid ports since rcNG is > >not needed for this port to work. If users want rcNG on pre-rcNG > >systems, they can install the rc_subr themselves and the squid start > >scripts will then use rcNG. > > See above. Just USE_RC_SUBR, as everybody does, I'll file a PR against the > squid ports. Sigh. "As everybody does" == "As you keep talking everybody into" www/squid respects rcNG but does not enforce its use on non-rcNG systems. I do not know why this is such a problem for you. I would really like you to stop doing advocacy on this right now and instead ask you to respect what I have done. Thanks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040223132524.GA520>