From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 12 10:43:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE7C1065680 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE228FC27 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o6CAhmta036220; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:43:49 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:43:48 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Peter Jeremy In-Reply-To: <20100712100158.GF27065@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <20100712203650.T63106@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <1278572030.4c3575feb972f@webmail.netspace.net.au> <20100712081619.GD27065@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20100712190941.X63106@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20100712100158.GF27065@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Australian 3G ppp.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:43:55 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2010-Jul-12 19:43:23 +1000, Ian Smith wrote: > >On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > # Ludicrous number of retries to try and convince it to work without MS NBNS > > > set ipcpretry 3 50 > > > >What happens without and with this? As I read ppp(8), it could take up > >to 50 IPCP configreqs at 3 seconds to negotiate IP and/or DNS addresses? > > My experience was that the link would sometimes fail to come up. I'm > not sure why retrying works - it's as if the remote end wants to use > NetBIOS but will occasionally allow a connection without it. It's > possible that this is no longer required - I haven't tried removing it. > > The 3 second timeout isn't really an issue because the remote end will > normally immediately respond - with either an ACK or NACK. Ah yes, thanks. Ok them suggesting NetBIOS, as long as you can decline! cheers, Ian