From owner-cvs-all Sun Jan 2 22:39: 5 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from m0.cs.berkeley.edu (m0.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.176]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620EC14DAB; Sun, 2 Jan 2000 22:39:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from bubble.didi.com (sji-ca3-67.ix.netcom.com [209.109.233.67]) by m0.cs.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA02374; Sun, 2 Jan 2000 22:37:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by bubble.didi.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id WAA18699; Sun, 2 Jan 2000 22:37:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami) To: Warner Losh Cc: Tim Vanderhoek , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports INDEX References: <20000102212646.A1493@mad> <200001022328.PAA72484@freefall.freebsd.org> <200001030351.UAA33933@harmony.village.org> From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 02 Jan 2000 22:37:26 -0800 In-Reply-To: Warner Losh's message of "Sun, 02 Jan 2000 20:51:44 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk * From: Warner Losh * I'm still waiting to hit a perfect number of ports. * * When the sum of the factors of a number, excluding the number, is the * same as the number, that number is considered to be perfect. * * 6 is a perfect numbers (factors 1, 2, 3, 6 -> 1 + 2 + 3 = 6). There * are very few perfect numbers and I think we're already larger than the * smallest "small" perfect number, but well below the next "large" * perfect number. So what are those numbers? :) -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message