From owner-freebsd-security Thu Mar 28 0:58:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from nelly.internal.irrelevant.org (irrelevant.demon.co.uk [158.152.220.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E2537B41C for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 00:58:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from simond by nelly.internal.irrelevant.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 16qVhm-0000rZ-00; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 08:56:22 +0000 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 08:56:22 +0000 From: Simon Dick To: Michael Phaze Cc: FreeBSD-Security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pf OR ipf ? Message-ID: <20020328085622.GB2725@irrelevant.org> References: <200203280655.g2S6twk5004181@cairo.anu.edu.au> <001201c1d634$431afc50$2e01a8c0@MICHAEL2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001201c1d634$431afc50$2e01a8c0@MICHAEL2> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 07:40:44PM +1100, Michael Phaze wrote: > > > Howdy Crew, > > > > > > Is it possible to use OpenBSD's pf (Packet Filter - Firewall) with > FreeBSD ? > > > Or shall I use IPF ? > > > > You should use IPF on FreeBSD AND OpenBSD. > > > > Why use PF when you can use IPF ? :) > > > > Darren > > > Its probably a backlash against the lack of a code merge into FreeBSD > Stable of IPFilter (being 3.4.20) and the latest version of IPFilter being > 3.4.25 > :) But 3.4.25 is in current and I guess it'll get MFCd eventually :) -- Simon Dick simond@irrelevant.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message