From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 15:52:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24CC16A41F; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:52:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (glewis.dsl.xmission.com [166.70.56.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C50143D45; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:52:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA9Fpm8t068935; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:51:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jA9Fpl6N068934; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:51:47 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:51:47 -0700 From: Greg Lewis To: Panagiotis Astithas Message-ID: <20051109155147.GA68848@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <432E6E1B.8020108@ebs.gr> <1127129214.997.5.camel@klamath.syndrom23.de> <1131402336.1264.6.camel@localhost> <437052E9.2040004@FreeBSD.org> <1131444971.69134.5.camel@server.mcneil.com> <4370906B.4090206@FreeBSD.org> <1131473519.95131.2.camel@server.mcneil.com> <1131506115.98117.3.camel@server.mcneil.com> <437189E2.1040405@FreeBSD.org> <4371B635.90603@ebs.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4371B635.90603@ebs.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: eclipse@freebsd.org, Alexander Nedotsukov , gnome Subject: Re: Failed to build eclipse with gnome 2.12 (failed on cario) X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:52:09 -0000 On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:41:25AM +0200, Panagiotis Astithas wrote: > >>To follow up, it appears that the files patched are just for the > >>standard 32-bit implementation. For 64-bit, those files appear to be > >>copied over then regenerated from the class file. So, the problem is > >>that Cairo.java is not patched and it doesn't correspond to the new > >>cairo.c. Using cairo in its current state should not really be possible > >>even on i386 as they don't match up. > >> > >> > >Sounds like true. But I am not an eclipse expert. Please speak up to > >patch author to finish this work. > > In the meantime you could check the original patches at: > > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=106527 > > It seems there are some extra patches that Andreas hasn't kept in his > version, that might make a difference on amd64. Actually, I think that what is needed is the extra patches to the .java files (as Sean points out) from the original patch and additional patches for the amd64 platform (since that isn't included in the original patch or Andreas). If I have time I'll try and look at this today. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org