From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 20 07:56:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3990F6BF for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F9952453 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:56:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tom.home (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAK7uWCd094307; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 09:56:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 kib.kiev.ua rAK7uWCd094307 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rAK7uUUN094306; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 09:56:30 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 09:56:30 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Andreas Tobler Subject: Re: WEAK_REFERENCE? Message-ID: <20131120075630.GF59496@kib.kiev.ua> References: <527EB428.6070104@FreeBSD.org> <20131111074706.GK59496@kib.kiev.ua> <5283ECA3.4080502@FreeBSD.org> <20131114060026.GH59496@kib.kiev.ua> <528A8E17.5090307@FreeBSD.org> <20131119072312.GW59496@kib.kiev.ua> <528BA500.4050203@fgznet.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="I6TLfviLsKOBuB85" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <528BA500.4050203@fgznet.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tom.home Cc: Current , brde@optusnet.com.au X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 07:56:50 -0000 --I6TLfviLsKOBuB85 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:50:56PM +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote: > On 19.11.13 08:23, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:00:55PM +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote: > >> Here the two patches > >> amd64: > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~andreast/weak_ref_amd64.diff > >> i386: > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~andreast/weak_ref_i386.diff > >=20 > > Amd64 patch is fine. For i386, I do not see a definition of the > > WEAK_REFERENCE in the patch, and quick search of the pre-existing > > definition in sys/i386 or lib/libc/i386 does not reveal anything. >=20 > It's there now. Updated the diff. i386 patch looks fine. --I6TLfviLsKOBuB85 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSjGstAAoJEJDCuSvBvK1BE+MQAItz4w0y2MkrYoM3OPIm96UF aAmxp2a8OqTokrUxnXMAmqkrpfmFhghJpGEqW7LHyEMYbLTCGRRDICrsg8ahTAtT LOuPieIr1pDjnYG95Z+iCmQ/mE+vQaEsaYW50Kt3RoUAU82qe2vLdILB17A5riho 2dktSHdOfFIO47DizJ/jGQjO/fIROp/ecoEjoDAkO/UIuffHu+vLHGdu4sA5zLcw uGDv6tVw60PisugwsrInzpwjiPOqQ9kcw2Qhgdroc1UKKMKvfj/HnkdWRE7UW4bs rMtj8Ct4TvG7ek5ya21SYT3z7FNKGHpWXU+QIZR/dq2cr04VaMRHuZTe7U/4dYLZ 9yPS6NZvkVpRHmwquvXt5t86VWifG1sPDVQim0cUV89tExO5FSVWyWX+MSkOyCa4 iGAH/gLduYiGBrTM8SJuZEfIVzkxD/8qVhuk8g2T893fOphTrmuIRPRpMzDdUHi0 lA2Y9yKp5kF2cNMm9g9H0BmPwrOr4AcGe3242YUzSRmZhyNUWL+2r/wnzyCkMaRX h2LSKv4JNXk762+Vl1oj8JtO/wbyHTMP21P+VuCHRy3fNJFkTLG6HGom+lxgCgCd vJ/2kRkFX4TaLlp2nahoKoS1SfIKKjZXDEBW7UUEWjFXO8FK17iwOgZnVnKGp5XD jr5uGqCbmjYipD4knDfL =w3CP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --I6TLfviLsKOBuB85--