From owner-freebsd-security  Sun May 17 13:02:31 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA08746
          for freebsd-security-outgoing; Sun, 17 May 1998 13:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from gvr.gvr.org (guido@gvr.gvr.org [194.151.74.97])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA08670
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 17 May 1998 13:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from guido@gvr.org)
Received: (from guido@localhost)
	by gvr.gvr.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id WAA03452;
	Sun, 17 May 1998 22:01:42 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org>
Message-Id: <199805172001.WAA03452@gvr.gvr.org>
Subject: Re: Why aren't security fixes posted to security-announce?
In-Reply-To: <199805151330.NAA30305@paranoid.eltex.spb.ru> from "ark@eltex.spb.ru" at "May 15, 98 01:30:19 pm"
To: ark@eltex.spb.ru
Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 22:01:42 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au, eltex.spb.ru@gvr.gvr.org,
        fpscha@schapachnik.com.ar, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> 
> btw i've noticed that patches for 2.1 branch aren't posted anymore.
> It is not hard (usually) to apply patches from 2.2 to 2.1 but sometimes
> (i'd even say often) it has to be done manually. 
> 
> I am fully satisfied with 2.1.7.1 system and i do not want to upgrade.

I will make a 2.1 patch and post an advisory update next monday.

-Guido

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message