From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 27 15:35:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CA116A41A for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:35:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatman@crackmonkey.us) Received: from crackmonkey.us (crackmonkey.us [70.58.166.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93AC13C465 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:35:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fatman@crackmonkey.us) Received: from tarani-bosatsu.dreamtrack.dnsalias.com (cpc1-swin7-0-0-cust216.brhm.cable.ntl.com [::ffff:86.18.88.217]) (AUTH: PLAIN fatman, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by crackmonkey.us with esmtp; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:35:00 -0600 id 0017C0AB.47235AAA.00007863 Message-ID: <47235A94.60800@crackmonkey.us> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:34:44 +0100 From: Adam J Richardson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070830) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" References: <4722BAC1.9030906@optonline.net> <20071027063215.K1571@small> <4722BF50.4040805@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4722BF50.4040805@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "P.U.Kruppa" , FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org, "E. J. Cerejo" Subject: Re: Portupgrade used to be fun!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:35:16 -0000 Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > P.U.Kruppa wrote: >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, E. J. Cerejo wrote: >> >>> Not anymore! Every time I cvsup my ports tree and I see all of those >>> ports that need to be updated my belly aches and that's because >>> portupgrade doesn't work the way it used to work. It is not fun any >>> more! Always an issue, either a port conflicts with another port or >>> it fails all together. I have forgotten the last time I updated my >>> ports without any issues. Today scrollkeeper is conflicting with >>> rarian, they install files on the same directory. >> Did you have a look at /usr/ports/UPDATING ? >> (I guess you have got a problem with the latest gnome.) > >>From my experience I think anyone upgrading on 8-CURRENT (and from > reports perhaps 7-????) will have the same issue I had this issue yesterday when upgrading Gnome on 6.2-RELEASE-p7. It's not just 7-FOO and 8-CURRENT that're affected. The solution that worked for me was this: 1. Force uninstall scrollkeeper. 2. Manually install rarian. 3. "pkgdb -F" to fix the stale links to scrollkeeper. 4. Restart the portupgrade process. HtH, Adam J Richardson