From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Nov 29 17:50:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA05469 for stable-outgoing; Sat, 29 Nov 1997 17:50:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable) Received: from bullfrog.winternet.com (jstepka@bullfrog.winternet.com [204.246.64.212]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA05399 for ; Sat, 29 Nov 1997 17:50:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jstepka@bullfrog.winternet.com) Received: from localhost (jstepka@localhost) by bullfrog.winternet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA00672 for ; Sat, 29 Nov 1997 19:49:04 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 1997 19:49:04 -0600 (CST) From: Justen Stepka To: FreeBSD-stable@freebsd.org Subject: CPU Load Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Recently I added memory to my NFS server (dx4-100 now w/ 32 megs of RAM), when I did this the overall system preformance increased dramiticly. The problem that I noticed was that when using NFS/NIS the CPU load climbs to about 4.0+, is there a special reason that this might be happening? Thanks in advance, Justen Stepka