From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 24 19:30:13 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DE7823
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 24 May 2013 19:30:13 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
 [188.252.31.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6A3BDB
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 24 May 2013 19:30:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r4OJU1ih005652
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 24 May 2013 21:30:01 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
 by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r4OJU1mN005649
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 24 May 2013 21:30:01 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 21:30:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: stupid question about sendmail
In-Reply-To: <20130524153444.GA30499@quiet.esmtp.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305242129310.5646@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305240931470.14121@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305240936340.72982@mail.fig.ol.no>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305240954290.14216@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305241014090.72982@mail.fig.ol.no>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305241054530.72982@mail.fig.ol.no>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305241203270.2073@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305241207070.72982@mail.fig.ol.no>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1305241248040.72982@mail.fig.ol.no>
 <20130524153444.GA30499@quiet.esmtp.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 24 May 2013 21:30:01 +0200 (CEST)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 19:30:13 -0000

works fine after your advice. thank you very much.

FEATURE(`access_db')
FEATURE(`blacklist_recipients')


On Fri, 24 May 2013, Claus Assmann wrote:

> On Fri, May 24, 2013, Trond Endrest?l wrote:
>
> [freebsd-hackers doesn't seem like the appropriate list...]
>
>>> FEATURE(access_db, `hash -o -T<TMPF> /etc/mail/access')
>
> Do NOT use -o. Moreover, do not specify arguments that are default.
> FEATURE(`access_db')
> is the best choice.
>
>> One final(?) note: You might need this line as well:
>
>> FEATURE(blacklist_recipients)
>
> That's not a "might", that's a "MUST" for this case.
>
> Note: (sendmail's) cf/README is a rather useful document.
>