Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 04:08:13 -0500 From: Tim Tsai <tim@futuresouth.com> To: "W. Reilly Cooley, Esq." <wcooley@nakedape.ml.org> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CUCIPOP? Message-ID: <19980703040813.08250@futuresouth.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980702114933.12638D-100000@rheingold>; from W. Reilly Cooley, Esq. on Thu, Jul 02, 1998 at 11:54:28AM -0700 References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980702114933.12638D-100000@rheingold>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 02, 1998 at 11:54:28AM -0700, W. Reilly Cooley, Esq. wrote: > I've read a couple of messages in other lists recommending CUCIPOP in > light of the recent exploits of QPOPPER. Has anyone tried this? What are > you opinions? One thing obviously irritating about QPOPPER is the > difficultly in transferring large attachments. Our problem with CUCIPOP was that it does not mark the messages as "read" if you don't delete the messages. I understand that there are good technical reasons for it, but we had a number of users that complained due to privacy issues. Otherwise it is an excellent package. Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980703040813.08250>