From owner-freebsd-current Mon Sep 14 02:17:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA06112 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 02:17:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from math.berkeley.edu (math.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.183.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA06102 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 02:17:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@math.berkeley.edu) Received: (from dan@localhost) by math.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA09398; Mon, 14 Sep 1998 02:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 02:17:01 -0700 (PDT) From: dan@math.berkeley.edu (Dan Strick) Message-Id: <199809140917.CAA09398@math.berkeley.edu> To: dg@root.com Subject: Re: Download of FreeBSD 3.0-SNAP Cc: dan@math.berkeley.edu, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >FreeBSD no longer does elevator sorts on data pending output, > >relying instead on the disk hardware to be smarter about this, > >especially given the likelihood that the drive is lying about > >its pysical geometry, making it unlikely that any sort you > >could do would result in an optimization. Even so, the driver should sort the I/O requests whenever the system's buffer queue for the drive exceeds the capacity of the system/host-adapter/drive for concurrently active commands. Since actual drive "geometry" is usually messy these days, a simple minded sort by block number would be appropriate. Dan Strick dan@math.berkeley.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message