Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:52:22 +0900 (JST) From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> To: jmz@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org, stas@FreeBSD.org, kris@obsecurity.org, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migration to gfortran42 Message-ID: <20070109.205222.74696332.chat95@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20070109091007.2C1DB56FA@nyx.dalai-zebu.org> References: <20070107.133544.78739935.chat95@mac.com> <20070109.175640.102530289.chat95@mac.com> <20070109091007.2C1DB56FA@nyx.dalai-zebu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Jean-Marc Zucconi <jmz@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Migration to gfortran42 Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:10:07 +0100 (CET) > >>>>> NAKATA Maho writes: > > > Dear maintainers using Fortran and portmgr, > > First, portmgr@ > > for migration purpose only I'd like to add > >> WANT_FORTRAN=yes > >> USE_GCC=4.2+ > > to each port that requires fortran. is it okay? if build is broken > > with this fortran, I'll fix, the I'll commit. Could you please approve > > my commits? > > I would like to have the option of NOT using gcc 4.2. I am happy with > the stock compiler in 6.x and don't use other FORTRAN ports requiring > f90. Understand. > At a minimum the libraries version must be changed so that older > applications still work if by mistake we reinstall the libraries. I > have a lot of programs compiled with lapack I don't want to rebuild. Okay, I'll change the version of shared lib number. Then, is it okay for you? and bump port revision. If you approve I'll go ahead... -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070109.205222.74696332.chat95>