From owner-freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Sun Apr 10 19:25:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B28B0BBC6 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 19:25:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A57E1F15 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 19:25:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u3AJPMQX044013 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 19:25:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208681] [patch] CARP preemption explanation is misleading Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 19:25:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Documentation X-Bugzilla-Component: Documentation X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: philipp@copythat.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 19:25:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208681 Bug ID: 208681 Summary: [patch] CARP preemption explanation is misleading Product: Documentation Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Keywords: patch Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Documentation Assignee: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Reporter: philipp@copythat.de Keywords: patch Created attachment 169161 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D169161&action= =3Dedit clarified proposal for the preemption note The handbook states in a note on CARP: > If preemption has been enabled, hostc.example.org might not release the v= irtual IP > address back to the original master server. The preemption setting does the opposite of what I would interpret this sentence to convey. Preemption needs to be enabled in order for the system = with a lower advskew value (the original master) to take the address back. In writing this, I wonder if it also needs a sentence on where to enable preemption (master, backup or both...). I'd assume there are very few scenarios, where different settings on nodes in the same group would be use= ful or necessary. I have attached a proposed change for this note. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=