From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 22 05:54:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C17106566B for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:54:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from thyme.infocus-llc.com (server.infocus-llc.com [206.156.254.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754C58FC0C for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-174-50-4-38.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [174.50.4.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thyme.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 501B937B49A; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 00:54:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3Wfw5R4jxkzDsq; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 00:54:35 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 00:54:35 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Zoran Kolic Message-ID: <20120722055435.GC85415@over-yonder.net> References: <20120719160831.GA1086@mycenae.sbb.rs> <20120720104334.GA85415@over-yonder.net> <20120720153701.GA1148@mycenae.sbb.rs> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120720153701.GA1148@mycenae.sbb.rs> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21-fullermd.4 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at thyme.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: branch 9 and uefi X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:54:42 -0000 On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 05:37:01PM +0200 I heard the voice of Zoran Kolic, and lo! it spake thus: > > Hurrah! I shall get a bit cheaper version, plain m5a97 or pro. AFAIK, the only difference between the plain M5A97 and the Evo is that the Evo has better VRM's. If you're overclocking a 125w CPU, it's definitely worth it; otherwise, probably not so much. (I'm not, but I like headroom ;) > Let me ask you further. What option you chose during install? Well, I'm running disks I was running in another system before. I installed them by having a running system on another disk, then setting them up manually from there. I'm kinda particular... > Further, what ram did you put on the board? It proved to be picky > regarding memory. I'm running a Kingston KVR1600D3E11SK4/16G set. http://www.amazon.com/Kingston-ValueRAM-1600MHz-KVR1600D3E11SK4-16G/dp/B007N9056A/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_S_nC?ie=UTF8&colid=3E7FYCA8C0KHE&coliid=I29FFUTSMXJ5YN No problems with it. But I wouldn't expect any. Kingston's always been good for me on the one side, and I really haven't seen near the problems out of the boards some people have. I suspect there's a heavy contingent of people pushing weird bleeding-edge memory speeds and failing... -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.