From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 21 17:42:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28591065676 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (bigknife-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:75::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C8B8FC12 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m9LHg6JI006766; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:42:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:02:07 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810211202.08129.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [IPv6:::1]); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:42:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.1/8461/Tue Oct 21 10:16:58 2008 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=4.2 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: pluknet Subject: Re: (possible) mis-merge of per-cpu stats to 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:42:19 -0000 On Tuesday 21 October 2008 11:02:24 am pluknet wrote: > Hi! > > It seems that after John's partial backup to restore 6.x ABI > read_cpu_time() became useless. > It's no more called from sysctl_kern_cp_time(). I don't think it hurts anything to stay there. You could make it just copy the global cp_time[] array instead perhaps. -- John Baldwin