From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 03:05:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8018D1065674 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:05:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofx-freebsd-xen@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356C68FC26 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:05:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofx-freebsd-xen@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LSipW-0004fC-Nl for freebsd-xen@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:10:02 +0000 Received: from 77.64.176.217 ([77.64.176.217]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:10:02 +0000 Received: from js by 77.64.176.217 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:10:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org From: Julian Stecklina Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:08:33 +0100 Lines: 44 Message-ID: <87ocxp1tym.fsf@tabernacle.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.64.176.217 X-Archive: encrypt User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BucDDrv6CHIHzvn+prPhVjbfCbs= Sender: news Subject: kern.hz = 10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:05:01 -0000 Hello, I have an 8-CURRENT (as of yesterday) DomU running. kern.hz is set to 10. Is this intended? This gives some strange effects: $ ping www.google.de PING www.l.google.com (74.125.39.99): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 74.125.39.99: icmp_seq=0 ttl=246 time=100.000 ms 64 bytes from 74.125.39.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=246 time=0.000 ms 64 bytes from 74.125.39.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=246 time=0.000 ms dmesg: FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #0 r187877: Thu Jan 29 16:32:39 CET 2009 julian@bsd-xen-builder.localnet:/usr/home/julian/src/obj/usr/home/julian/sr c/head/sys/BLITZXEN WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance. Xen reported: 701.590 MHz processor. Timecounter "ixen" frequency 1000000000 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel Pentium III Xeon (701.59-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6a1 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383fbff real memory = 268435456 (256 MB) avail memory = 254689280 (242 MB) cpu=0 irq=0 vector=0 cpu=0 irq=0 vector=1 kbd0 at kbdmux0 xenbus0: on motherboard xc0: on motherboard Timecounters tick every 100.000 msec xbd0: 4096MB at device/vbd/51713 on xenbus0 xn0: at device/vif/0 on xenbus0 xn0: Ethernet address: aa:00:4b:17:23:8e [XEN] netfront_backend_changed: newstate=2 Btw, it is very cool to see FreeBSD on Xen. :) Regards, -- Julian Stecklina Well, take it from an old hand: the only reason it would be easier to program in C is that you can't easily express complex problems in C, so you don't. - Erik Naggum (in comp.lang.lisp)