From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Oct 17 18:12:30 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9C610DBE2B for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 18:12:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@omnilan.de) Received: from mx0.gentlemail.de (mx0.gentlemail.de [IPv6:2a00:e10:2800::a130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CD418CCD0; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 18:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@omnilan.de) Received: from mh0.gentlemail.de (ezra.dcm1.omnilan.net [78.138.80.135]) by mx0.gentlemail.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w9HICOtO076605; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 20:12:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@omnilan.de) Received: from titan.inop.mo1.omnilan.net (s1.omnilan.de [217.91.127.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mh0.gentlemail.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94DC5E3B; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 20:12:24 +0200 (CEST) Subject: RE: [TOPICADJUST:] if_lagg(4)+if_vlan(4) panic: sleeping in an epoch section (igb, e1000_82575, actiall 82576 in use) To: Kevin Bowling Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , Stephen Hurd References: <201805072142.w47LgN1R041002@repo.freebsd.org> <5AF16B8B.7030703@omnilan.de> <5AF17134.7020602@omnilan.de> From: Harry Schmalzbauer Organization: OmniLAN Message-ID: <1a523858-e6a7-036f-b2f8-7b54d37448d4@omnilan.de> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 20:12:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: ACL 130 matched, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mx0.gentlemail.de [78.138.80.130]); Wed, 17 Oct 2018 20:12:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: mx0.gentlemail.de; Sender-ip: 78.138.80.135; Sender-helo: mh0.gentlemail.de; ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 18:12:30 -0000 Am 08.05.2018 um 11:52 schrieb Kevin Bowling: > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 2:43 AM, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: >> Bezüglich Kevin Bowling's Nachricht vom 08.05.2018 11:26 (localtime): >>> iflib in stable/11 only affects bnxt at this time. >>> >>> You should try out HEAD and let us know for the rest of your questions. >> >> Ic, sorry for the noise – should have read the commits before wasting >> others' time :-( >> >> Thanks for your help, but I can only briefly test hartwell and kawela >> (82574, Desktop 1gE and 82576, ET2 dual Server 1gE) and see how much >> queues they use, since I don't run -current on anything productive and >> spare time is even much more limited than spare machines ;-) >> Will find out who many queues i217 should provide as soon as possible >> and if it's more than one, I'll file a PR. >> >> But if the simple iflib/hw-support test with kawela+hartwell helps I'm >> happy to do. > > At this point it would be helpful, we think e1000 is nearing pretty > good shape and I need to become familiar with any outstanding bugs. Still refering your old reply: Please see new bug report related to e1000 and iflib, while this one might have it's roots in if_lagg(4)... https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232362 Thanks, -harry